
<Script type="text/javascript">

  var _gaq = _gaq || [];
  _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-36502622-1']);
  _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

  (function() {
    var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;
    ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';
    var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
  })();

</script>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Re-Regulating Special Access Is Not So Special For Consumers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconsumer.org/2012/06/07/why-re-regulating-special-access-is-not-so-special-for-consumers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconsumer.org/2012/06/07/why-re-regulating-special-access-is-not-so-special-for-consumers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 23:33:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The American Consumer Institute - &#187; FCC Ponders Price Regulation of Obsolete Data Services</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconsumer.org/2012/06/07/why-re-regulating-special-access-is-not-so-special-for-consumers/#comment-5905</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Consumer Institute - &#187; FCC Ponders Price Regulation of Obsolete Data Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theamericanconsumer.org/?p=4307#comment-5905</guid>
		<description>[...] to get the FCC to force the larger carriers to lower their prices for special access service.  As ACI’s president Steve Pociask explains, it’s basically one group attempting to get another group to subsidize them. In essence, the FCC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to get the FCC to force the larger carriers to lower their prices for special access service.  As ACI’s president Steve Pociask explains, it’s basically one group attempting to get another group to subsidize them. In essence, the FCC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech at Night: Privacy is unpopular, Leave Google alone, Apple app developers Union is silly</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconsumer.org/2012/06/07/why-re-regulating-special-access-is-not-so-special-for-consumers/#comment-5713</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech at Night: Privacy is unpopular, Leave Google alone, Apple app developers Union is silly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theamericanconsumer.org/?p=4307#comment-5713</guid>
		<description>[...] of expanding government. Now it&#8217;s the &#8220;Special Access&#8221; debate, and both IIA and ACI have the story on why we don&#8217;t want government sticking its nose into the marketplace, trying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of expanding government. Now it&#8217;s the &#8220;Special Access&#8221; debate, and both IIA and ACI have the story on why we don&#8217;t want government sticking its nose into the marketplace, trying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech at Night: Privacy is unpopular, Leave Google alone, Apple app developers Union is silly &#124; Get Free Software</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconsumer.org/2012/06/07/why-re-regulating-special-access-is-not-so-special-for-consumers/#comment-5712</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech at Night: Privacy is unpopular, Leave Google alone, Apple app developers Union is silly &#124; Get Free Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theamericanconsumer.org/?p=4307#comment-5712</guid>
		<description>[...] Access&#8221; debate, &#097;&#110;&#100; &#098;&#111;&#116;&#104; IIA &#097;&#110;&#100; ACI &#104;&#097;&#118;&#101; the &#115;&#116;&#111;&#114;&#121; &#111;&#110; why we don&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Access&#8221; debate, &#097;&#110;&#100; &#098;&#111;&#116;&#104; IIA &#097;&#110;&#100; ACI &#104;&#097;&#118;&#101; the &#115;&#116;&#111;&#114;&#121; &#111;&#110; why we don&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech at Night: Privacy is unpopular, Leave Google alone, Apple app developers Union is silly &#124; RedState</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconsumer.org/2012/06/07/why-re-regulating-special-access-is-not-so-special-for-consumers/#comment-5711</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech at Night: Privacy is unpopular, Leave Google alone, Apple app developers Union is silly &#124; RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 07:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theamericanconsumer.org/?p=4307#comment-5711</guid>
		<description>[...] of expanding government. Now it&#8217;s the &#8220;Special Access&#8221; debate, and both IIA and ACI have the story on why we don&#8217;t want government sticking its nose into the marketplace, trying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of expanding government. Now it&#8217;s the &#8220;Special Access&#8221; debate, and both IIA and ACI have the story on why we don&#8217;t want government sticking its nose into the marketplace, trying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
